Mike's Oud Forums
Not logged in [Login - Register]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: Flatback vs Bowlback
majnuunNavid
Oud Junkie
*****




Posts: 622
Registered: 7-22-2013
Member Is Offline

Mood: Dude, where's my Oud?

[*] posted on 1-11-2014 at 01:02 PM
Flatback vs Bowlback


A question for all the oud builders out there, and any of you who have played flatback ouds.

What is the difference in sound between a flatback oud and a bowlback oud? How much does it effect the sound? Aside from potentially being more comfortable or easier to hold. is there any audio effect?

It might be different to explain in words the difference of sound. How does the sound reverberate in that shape?

I know some people are very particular about the shape of the instrument. Flatback vs bowlback mandolin for example, or traditional guitar shape ukulele's vs triangle shape Fluke ukulele.

I'm really interested so any opinions or information is welcome!




View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
Brian Prunka
Oud Junkie
*****




Posts: 2938
Registered: 1-30-2004
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Member Is Offline

Mood: Stringish

[*] posted on 1-11-2014 at 01:03 PM


I find that flatback ouds are more difficult to hold and play.
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
majnuunNavid
Oud Junkie
*****




Posts: 622
Registered: 7-22-2013
Member Is Offline

Mood: Dude, where's my Oud?

[*] posted on 1-11-2014 at 01:28 PM


I have never played one... so I wouldn't know...

But I have played some Barbat's which have deeper bowls than Ouds, and the angle of my right arm at the edge of the soundboard and back just tears up my forearm, can't stand it...

I don't like the idea of flatback ouds, changes the angle of your right arm, so I can see why one might find it uncomfortable to play.. but to each his own...




View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
hussamd
Oud Junkie
*****




Posts: 117
Registered: 12-18-2013
Location: Bartlett, IL
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 1-11-2014 at 02:19 PM


I would think the sound would be different. I tried one of the Godin Multioud a couple of weeks ago. I could not hold it like a guitar and my right arm was killing me. The sound was not deep enough for me to keep it, not even amplified and EQ'd.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
majnuunNavid
Oud Junkie
*****




Posts: 622
Registered: 7-22-2013
Member Is Offline

Mood: Dude, where's my Oud?

[*] posted on 1-11-2014 at 03:52 PM


scratch that... I have played MultiOud many times... I found the right arm very strange, but, my left hand was very comfortable. One of the most comfortable Ouds for left hand I've played.

Anyways, I should be more specific, flatback as in like an acoustic guitar, not electric Ouds, the sound... the sound...




View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
bulerias1981
Oud Junkie
*****




Posts: 770
Registered: 4-26-2009
Location: Beacon, NY
Member Is Offline

Mood: John Vergara Luthier Lord of the Strings instrument making and repair

[*] posted on 1-11-2014 at 07:52 PM


There's less volume in the bowl, so it doesn't cater to the low end very well, also the flat back and flat sides changes the total properties all together. Bowl back is where its at.



View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
spyblaster
Oud Junkie
*****




Posts: 285
Registered: 2-17-2010
Location: Iran - Karaj
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 1-12-2014 at 02:35 AM


Flat backs are easier to play, at least for me. but I don't like the acoustic sound (they usually have a sound output). I think a flat back oud with a sound output is very good for rehearsing (you don't have to carry an amp) and works pretty well as an electric oud. but the acoustic sound for performance? I don't think so.



The Oud is my life, n my life is the Oud
View user's profile View All Posts By User

  Go To Top

Powered by XMB
XMB Forum Software © 2001-2011 The XMB Group