Mike's Oud Forums

OUD / SAROD hybrid instrument

Edward Powell - 10-11-2011 at 10:56 AM

This is Ragmakamtar (version #9). Basically it is a combination of an oud and a sarod (with elements of fretless guitar and sitar). I began designing and building these guys in 2006, and until now I have not been fully satisfied with any of them. But finally, I can happily say that this one really does it for me completely! Whew......

If you would like to hear test clips made today (DAY 1, completed the instrument today!) - they are roughly made and played, but gives the idea:
1) oud neck (upper neck)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LXDM8TEvPQk
2) sarod neck (lower neck)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m2gOcczf7IM

adamgood - 10-11-2011 at 11:45 AM

Nice Edward sounds really great! What kind of room are you playing in? Sounds big...got any tiny room sized vids?

Edward Powell - 10-11-2011 at 11:53 AM

Quote: Originally posted by adamgood  
Nice Edward sounds really great! What kind of room are you playing in? Sounds big...got any tiny room sized vids?


hahahaha.... this is our bedroom that I totally re-made last summer. Cleared out all the old carpets and beds and and and... installed a new walnut floor and huge mirrored waredrobe, and the ceiling is really high. . . . I LOVE practicing in this room.

I will record some test clips tomorrow in a smaller room. Are you curious to hear how the instrument sounds in a more dry situation?

corridoio - 10-11-2011 at 11:57 AM

Hi Edward,
to me both has beautiful, deep sound, I'm curious to see photos!
Did you used just one long bridge for both?
Also I didn't see the usual sympathetic strings on the side
Ale

Edward Powell - 10-11-2011 at 12:09 PM

Quote: Originally posted by corridoio  
Hi Edward,
to me both has beautiful, deep sound, I'm curious to see photos!
Did you used just one long bridge for both?
Also I didn't see the usual sympathetic strings on the side
Ale


Hi Corridoio
...thanks so much! I am also really satisfied.
Do u use facebook? I documented the whole build with fotos on facebook http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.10150289121049639.337487.7...
I am really lazy to upload fotos onto forums these days - it is so much work. . . . unless someone can explain to me an easy way?

Yes, just one long fixed bridge for both --- the bridge is extremely minimal. I just cancelled the sympathetic strings - - and I made the whole instrument as light and minimalistic as possible..... I am sure that this has a lot to do with the richer tone of this model. Light is Bright!!!

Let me know if you can get to the facebook fotos.

corridoio - 10-11-2011 at 12:29 PM

seems I can't open the link, anyway I just asked you friendship there so this should resolve the problem
minimalistic and light seems always a great thing when it comes to instrument acoustics
ale



Edward Powell - 10-11-2011 at 12:38 PM

Quote: Originally posted by corridoio  
seems I can't open the link, anyway I just asked you friendship there so this should resolve the problem
minimalistic and light seems always a great thing when it comes to instrument acoustics
ale




yes that's right - those fotos are set to friends only.... probably i will keep it that way since this is pretty personal material - so please anyone else, just send me a friends request, I always accept them from everyone unless it is obviously spam...

- - - I think the more I learn about acoustics, the LESS I actually understand. For example, light is usually the best, but some instruments are REALLY heavy... like sarod! and it sounds amazing!

adamgood - 10-11-2011 at 02:03 PM

Ha ha I imagine that's a very enjoyable room to play in! Yes please find the crappiest room imaginable :)

The sarod neck is craaaaazy! What can you tell us about it? Wood fingerboard?? Metal strings? What kind of strings are you using? Simple guitar or something more specific? The sustain is very impressive.

Quote: Originally posted by Edward Powell  
Quote: Originally posted by adamgood  
Nice Edward sounds really great! What kind of room are you playing in? Sounds big...got any tiny room sized vids?


hahahaha.... this is our bedroom that I totally re-made last summer. Cleared out all the old carpets and beds and and and... installed a new walnut floor and huge mirrored waredrobe, and the ceiling is really high. . . . I LOVE practicing in this room.

I will record some test clips tomorrow in a smaller room. Are you curious to hear how the instrument sounds in a more dry situation?

Edward Powell - 10-11-2011 at 02:29 PM

Quote: Originally posted by adamgood  
Ha ha I imagine that's a very enjoyable room to play in! Yes please find the crappiest room imaginable :)

The sarod neck is craaaaazy! What can you tell us about it? Wood fingerboard?? Metal strings? What kind of strings are you using? Simple guitar or something more specific? The sustain is very impressive.
[/ rquote]

Crappiest room? That should not be hard to find :)) !
Yeah I discovered a few tricks to get the sound I want from the sarod neck... of course the fingerboard must be harder than ebony (I use trespa which is a mix of synthetic resin and paper). Standard sarod strings (steel and bronze for the thicker ones). The trick is playing on the fingernails and using an extremely hard pick.... also, like an oud, the strings are very thin and tuned quite slack - - - it took me many years to undo my guitar/sitar conditioning which says "heavier strings, and higher tuning, and higher action = best sound"! I now go for just the opposite: thin strings, low tuning, low action (but the sarod has Everest action like all Indian instruments)

charlie oud - 10-12-2011 at 03:18 AM

Lovely work and sound Edward. I think a single neck 'Saroud' would also be good, may be with steel fingerboard. Quite frankly the sarod is a beast in terms of weight and no teacher will take me seriously unless I sit cross legged on the floor, which I find uncomfortable and unnecesary. Became tired of cultural police.
The left hand nail technique is beatiful for raga.
congratulations on your great work.

Edward Powell - 10-12-2011 at 04:34 AM

Quote: Originally posted by charlie oud  
Lovely work and sound Edward. I think a single neck 'Saroud' would also be good, may be with steel fingerboard. Quite frankly the sarod is a beast in terms of weight and no teacher will take me seriously unless I sit cross legged on the floor, which I find uncomfortable and unnecesary. Became tired of cultural police.
The left hand nail technique is beatiful for raga.
congratulations on your great work.


Thanks my friend... I totally agree about 'cultural police' - - -
you mean, to make instrument with just the sarod neck, leaving off the oud neck entirely? ...primarily as a way to have a sit down instrument that is not so heavy? ...sure, this is easily possible - just depends on which note you want as "Sa", and what scale length you are used to etc etc... I'm glad you like the sound ;)

em.20 - 10-12-2011 at 04:40 AM

I can't understand the different sound from the lower and the higher neck because both share the same soundbox?

Edward Powell - 10-12-2011 at 04:46 AM

Quote: Originally posted by em.20  
I can't understand the different sound from the lower and the higher neck because both share the same soundbox?


you mean you can't understand how it is possible to get such a radically different tone from the same instrument???

Well, in terms of frequencies, I realised that the oud and sarod share the same range except an oud goes down one more octave lower - so an oud's soundboard theoretically should reproduce a sarod's range very well.

BUT when you are dealing with a multistringed double neck instrument the danger is to overload the soundboard and body with too much extra weight and tension - which would cause the soundboard not to function optimally... so I kept the stringing to a minimum (notice oud only 9 strings - sarod only 6), and all extra wood off...

After that it is only a question of the sarod having a different fingerboard, strings, mizrab, and playing technique. . . . that's all ;)

MatthewW - 10-13-2011 at 11:46 PM

Hi Edward- I am impressed with the sound of the sarod part of this double necked instrument. As mentioned, the sarod sound and technique is usually played using some of the fingernail, is this required on your sarod fingerboard or can it be played with the tips of the fingers like the oud or guitar? How high is the action at nut and neck join on the sarod fingerboard? How deep did you make the body?
Could you build just the single neck sarod, and what prices are we looking at if possible? cheers buddy- PM me ifyou wish- Matthew

Edward Powell - 10-14-2011 at 01:15 AM

Hi MW... great to hear from you!

yes... absolutely the fingernail is needed for getting this sarod tone - also, I am plucking with a metal wire sitar pick (this is the secret, don't tell anyone! ooops... it's too late I guess ;) )

but I think if you are patient you could avoid having to reinforce the nail tips with superglue. Without the glue the natual nail wares down quickly and eventually begins to hurt and be more difficult to make a good contact --- however I think that after a few weeks you would build up toughness in the skin there and you would not need as much nail and certainly no glue..... but I have never pushed myself completely thru this process... I always break down and put on the glue.

I can really tell you that I am totally satisfied with this instrument - FINALLY!!! After 5 years of mucking around and being practically certain that the concept was impossible..... so far I have not had to adjust anything at all --- all bridge hights are 11mm right from the beginning. Neck angles and FB surface need no adjustments - nothing... and there is no deformation in the SB and necks are not bending forward at all! It sounds better and better each day! I am SOOOOO tempted to jump in and build another one - this time 65.5cm and in the key of "A".... but I need to restrain myself and rather focus on improving my playing (especially my oud playing).

All action at nuts is essentially zero - I just get those as low as possible without buzzing. The sarod action at the body (9th fret position on a 61.5 scale SA = A#) is 4 or 5mm. The 4th sarod string really needs this hight, but the higher strings could go down quite a lot however. I just keep it all high for now cuz it works and feels good to me. The only one possible drawback to the sarod neck is that you can reach the 12 fret position without having to pull your thumb out from around the back - in order to reach the highest part of the fingerboard.... but this is manageable.

The body is a bit deeper than a regular oud's... about 22cm. I took a lot of care to tune the SB and AIR to Sa and Re komal... it is also 'grabbing' very well at Ni and Dha.... must be strong ni and dha somewhere in the SB.

- - -

A single sarod neck version would be easily possible. I believe I am able to reproduce this tonal effect by tuning the AIR and SB. I can do this by adjusting the soundhole sizes. It would surely have basically the same sound as this one..... however if you are considering only a sarod neck... then you might be interested in an experiment which is about to take place. A friend of mine who is an Indian sarod player has been following my work and asked me to help his with building basically that - a single sarod wood body instrument. He does NOT feel good with big bodies so I suggested to him to make the body a mini-oud. You see I have this one tuned to SA on octave BELOW anything playable on the sarod --- so my friend is going to try to build with a smaller body and we will tune it to the SA one octave higher which is the actual lowest note on the sarod - - - - i'm not sure of the result.... I really don't know.... It might be better or worse... I can tell you my guess. I think it might have a bit more punch in the mid-range, but perhaps will not sound so big and full... anyhow, at least I am sure the results of this experiment will be interesting for you...

I would charge 1500 Euro for a single sarod version. This would be built with the same woods as rmtar9 and same decoration level. I would be open to doing it. I would also be open to building a small one like my friend will try (but there is no guarantee this will work). Thanks for your interest Matt!


MatthewW - 10-14-2011 at 03:12 PM

Hi Edward, thanks for the info. Please keep me ( and some others here) posted on the experimental smaller sarod you are going to work on for your friend from Mother India, and though this is not a 100% oud topic the instruments are related in certain ways.
About the fingernails, don't you find having to have longer nails or using superglue and whatever for the sarod get in the way of fingering the oud, where shorter fingernails seem to be the way to go?

So you use the sitar mizrab! didn't notice that. Have you tried a traditional sarod coconut shell jaba/pick? How about a risha? :)
cheers MW

Edward Powell - 10-14-2011 at 03:37 PM

Hi Matt
Yes I'll post about the small sarod-oud on this thread.
I use pretty huge super-glue (and baby powered) paste on two fingers and it doesn't bother my oud playing . . . but I don't use the NShamma technique where he seems to use the nails also... and I prefer a pretty wide oud fingerboard so the glue globs don't touch the other strings. But there is no problem once you get adjusted.

I feel really comfortable with the sitar mizrab (since I have played sitar for 20 years)... yes, I have used an oud risha quite a lot but find it totally unsatisfactory http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=exItmRonRm4 ---in fact this was a point of mega frustration for a long time - and it wasn't until I simply changed from risha to sitar pick that my sound really started to come together - just here the difference on this clip - same instrument as the previous but with sitar pick.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x9t9dN_OucM

David.B - 10-15-2011 at 02:31 AM

You made it! Congratulations, it sounds very good and definitely better :applause:

farukturunz - 10-15-2011 at 12:19 PM

Congratulations Eddi! Yeah you have finally done it :applause:


Edward Powell - 10-15-2011 at 12:29 PM

Quote: Originally posted by farukturunz  
Congratulations Eddi! Yeah you have finally done it :applause:



...and take a wild guess who's bracing design I copied?? :bowdown:

farukturunz - 10-15-2011 at 02:01 PM

Quote: Originally posted by Edward Powell  

...and take a wild guess who's bracing design I copied?? :bowdown:


:))

Edward Powell - 10-15-2011 at 02:50 PM

Quote: Originally posted by farukturunz  

:)


...because the idea came to me "why not build upon something that definitely WORKS, rather than starting from scratch in the DARK?"

rojaros - 10-20-2011 at 08:54 PM

This is fantastic. Great sound on both 'instruments' ... amazing!

congratulations!

best wishes
Robert

Edward Powell - 10-21-2011 at 12:40 AM

HI Rob... Thanks for your kind words!

luan - 6-13-2012 at 11:09 AM

How f <b>shoot</b>, man, this is awesome!
The Sarod sounds awesome! Do you use your fingernail to play in the fingerboard?

Congratulations!

Edward Powell - 6-13-2012 at 12:05 PM

Quote: Originally posted by luan  
How f <b>shoot</b>, man, this is awesome!
The Sarod sounds awesome! Do you use your fingernail to play in the fingerboard?

Congratulations!


Thanks!
Yes, fingernail technique - and I reinforce with super-glue...

excentrik - 6-13-2012 at 12:10 PM

That thing is doooopppeee! Nice sound, great video clips-

One love!

Tarik

RubabPlayer - 6-14-2012 at 04:32 AM

Brilliant! I love the idea, the sound and the creativity behind this instrument. Well done.

I have recently seen a video of a Lavta with drone strings that was pretty amazing too.

I would love to make a long neck Afghan Rubab with 4-5 playable strings, 12 sympathetics and 2-3 drones.
Someday, I hope.

Edward Powell - 6-14-2012 at 05:00 AM

Quote: Originally posted by RubabPlayer  
Brilliant! I love the idea, the sound and the creativity behind this instrument. Well done.

I have recently seen a video of a Lavta with drone strings that was pretty amazing too.

I would love to make a long neck Afghan Rubab with 4-5 playable strings, 12 sympathetics and 2-3 drones.
Someday, I hope.


just go for it.... except be prepared to then launch into a series of experiments that will take years...
This is what happened to me - I started with version 1 and now I am beginning version 13!

http://www.edwardpowell.com/rmtar.html

...the problem is that all of these traditional instruments are the way they are because they developed over hundreds of years, and all the resonance modes slowly lined up and got perfectly matched.

Then come along people like us with our creative experimental ideas, and start combining this and that, and then realise that these things don't sound that good because major elements changed which upset the balance of resonance modes. . . . so in order to succeed in this experiment one needs to be prepared to experiment a lot.

Best is to start with very cheap and quick prototypes... and find out fast what works and what doesn't. Wait until you really know it will work before making a full decoration model...

Giorgioud - 6-14-2012 at 06:12 AM

That is so impressive, man!!! I bloody love it!!! Matter of fact, I was toying with the idea of putting some sympathetic strings on one of my my ouds (sarod-like), but after seeing this I'll have to revise the project. The sarod-like neck on the oud body (I expect you reinforced it to take the extra pressure of the steel strings), plus 9 sympathetic strings on the top. How about that? The only problem is that I cannot afford it :( .......

Edward Powell - 6-14-2012 at 06:27 AM

Quote: Originally posted by Giorgioud  
That is so impressive, man!!! I bloody love it!!! Matter of fact, I was toying with the idea of putting some sympathetic strings on one of my my ouds (sarod-like), but after seeing this I'll have to revise the project. The sarod-like neck on the oud body (I expect you reinforced it to take the extra pressure of the steel strings), plus 9 sympathetic strings on the top. How about that? The only problem is that I cannot afford it :( .......


Thank bro...
Version #9 came out extremely well, and to be honest it is the only instrument that I have ever built that I am totally overly satisfied with. In fact, I am going to build one more version 9 exact copy, and if the tone of this new one comes out equally as good - I am going to build 10 of them at once and sell them for a reasonable price.

The only one weird thing, which might be a major drawback for a lot of players is that this version 9 is tuned to Bb/Eb (which is one semitone higher than arab tuning, and one semitone lower than turkish tuning.

The scale is 61.5cm.

I have tried slightly expanding version 9 to get to arab tuning... but that magic tone didn't quite happen again.

I am pretty sure that making it a bit smaller and 58.5cm would produce great results in turkish tuning... so I need to try this.

If I can find a model that will appeal to a lot of players I will start building them in batches for a low price. Of course I can build to someones custom dream idea - but individual unique instruments are more costly to build.